On 08/04/2010, at 9:09 PM, Jarkko Oranen wrote: > >> Hopefully you can see that this syntax falls out of the direct construction >> of maven Model object, unmediated by intermediate syntax or data >> structuring. So there's a good reason for the way it looks. >> > > Right. Thanks for the thorough explanation. It's not so bad if you > quote the vectors instead of the individual symbols. However, it seems > to me that defmaven could very well be a plain function in that case > (just (reset! *MODEL* (apply Model args))). :)
Yes, you're right. I'll make that change. Antony Blakey ------------- CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd Ph: 0438 840 787 The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy. -- Martin Luther King -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
