(send contains-val? inc) On Apr 29, 9:06 am, Douglas Philips <d...@mac.com> wrote: > On 2010 Apr 29, at 4:21 AM, ataggart wrote: > > > Functions named contains-key? and contains-val? would make a lot more > > sense to me than the current contains? and new seq-contains?. Anyone > > looking at contains-val? should expect it to be O(n). The only > > effective difference would be that the test value for contains-val? is > > consistently a single value rather than a [key value] tuple for maps. > > +1 > > -Doug > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
