On 5月29日, 上午12时50分, Joost <jo...@zeekat.nl> wrote: > > I don't really see what you're trying to do with this, but as an > alternative, you can assoc lazy-seqs to a standard map. That is, if > your values are going to be seqs (IME, most of the things you want > lazy evaluation for are). > > Joost.
The reason is very simple: Existing code base (ring) choose map as the data structure, I want my new feature seamless merge into it, then I can use all the existing functions, and new codes become normal citizen in the design. The reason I ask is that I think this is so common a need, and its idea fits into clojure's philosophy. I do not want to reinvent wheels on a common need. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
