On Jun 4, 2010, at 16:23 , Chouser wrote:
>
> I agree with the spirit of your argument, but not your
> implementation:
>
> (update-in* {nil 2} [nil] (constantly 3))
> ;=> 3
As so often Chouser, you are of cause totally right :). I just realized the
flaw when I was about to open a ticket but you were faster ;) well this are
good news so since I don't have a CA signed yet (actually I do just not send it
:P) so one could use your code as a fix.
Regards,
Heinz
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
