And we could actually also add an no-arg version. My own version of interleave that I use looks like this:
(defn interleav ([] nil) ([c] (seq c)) ([c1 c2] (interleave c1 c2)) ([c1 c2 & colls] (apply interleave c1 c2 colls))) I guess that's as generic as it gets. Does Rich read all threads and will silently ignore/implement this or is there any other good way to get his attention without nagging/ spamming him? I remember suggesting some other enhancement earlier with rather underwhelming success... On Jun 1, 5:12 am, Daniel Werner <daniel.d.wer...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On May 31, 10:07 pm, Daniel Werner <daniel.d.wer...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > > quantitative logic > > That should have been "quantification logic". -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
