On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:20 PM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem is that it distinctly *not* easy to write fast numeric code in
> Clojure. It requires expert Clojure knowledge.
Right, but with just the prim branch and a shorthand for long literals, you get:
(defn ^:static fib ^long [^long n]
(if (<= n 1L)
1L
(+ (fib (dec n)) (fib (- n 2L)))))
which really isn't that bad. So my claim is that the prim branch gets
you far enough along the road to easy fast numeric code, without
screwing with the numeric tower.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
