I did: "Java arrays 18s" is Java arrays in Clojure. "Plain Java 2s" is Java arrays in Java.
Here's the Java code: http://gist.github.com/460063 That's what you meant, right? I agree that it looks very good :) "Mutable deftype" is a special case in that apart from the dotimes loop counter all numeric operations are done internally in a single mutable deftype instance, but it is still very good - in this scenario there was close to zero overhead from using Clojure. On Jul 1, 4:29 pm, Nicolas Oury <nicolas.o...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:27 AM, j-g-faustus > <johannes.fries...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > Using the equiv branch, I get > > * Java arrays: 18s > > * Immutable deftype: 10s > > * Mutable deftype: 2s > > * Plain Java: 2s > > That's a very encouraging result! That proves that the equiv branch, and > deftypes, can be as fast as java. > > Could you test an array in Plain Java to compare what comes from arrays and > what comes from array access in Clojure? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
