On 2 Lip, 09:46, Justin Kramer <jkkra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Partly in response to this issue and partly to get my feet wet with > Ring and friends, I spent the last few nights writing a proof-of- > concept Wiki to collect structured Clojure usage examples: > > http://clojure-examples.appspot.com/ > > Here's a sample function page: > > http://clojure-examples.appspot.com/clojure.core/contains%3F > > I tried to come up with something that encourages a many-hands > approach while maintaining structure and quality. There are plenty of > missing features, but it should be easy for anyone interested to jump > in and write some examples. It uses a modified version of Markdown for > syntax. Content could be exported/parsed en masse relatively easily. > > The source is on GitHub:http://github.com/jkk/clj-wiki > > Does this seem like a worthwhile approach? > > Justin
Great! I was thinking lately of building something similar with the same kind of approach. One suggestion: the core functions should be structured into categories rather than listed alphabetically., that is for example: Maps - fn1 - fn2 - fn3 Vectors - fn3 - fn4 - fn5 Arithmetic - fn6 - fn7 - fn8 etcetera. (Similar to what is in the cheat sheet) This would eliminate the tersness and it would be much easier to find a specific function (handy for newcomers to clojure) Other than that great job, I think it has big potential. It's clean, and easy to contribute. I will surely add some examples later today. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
