On Jul 6, 2010, at 8:23 AM, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote: > Hi, > > this comes up once in a while. See eg. here for an in-depth > discussion: > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/66ff0b89229be894/c3d4a6dae45d4852
So why hasn't it been incorporated yet into the standard library? The --> macro (or the let-> mentioned there) is more powerful than -> and ->>, and it also makes code more readable too. It seems strange therefore not to have one. - Greg > Note, that you can ease your pain a little with #(): (-> 3 (#(+ 1 % > 4)) (#(prn "answer:" %))). This is rather ugly, though. > > Sincerely > Meikel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
