On Wednesday, July 7, 2010, Mike Meyer <mwm-keyword-googlegroups.620...@mired.org> wrote: > Given that Sun is using javax, something like > "clojure.(author).(project)" would seem to be appropriate. That should > be safe from the DNS namespace (unless it means something when > transliterated into a foreign language) nor is a project in a language > other than clojure likely to use it.
I like this suggestion as it seems like most projects already have clojure in the name. I also advocate a naming scheme similar to CPAN. Finding the library you're interested in by search or browsing is much easier when projects are descriptively named. This also would encourage projects with the same goal to join forces, or at least be aware of each other's efforts. Because that description could get long, putting the author's name at the end makes more sense and also matches the semantics of forking. So for example clojure.http.ring.weavejester. Jim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
