Hi Stu, On 16 Jul., 19:54, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > The behavior you are seeing is not a problem, and understanding why may be > helpful to using agents correctly. > > The thread that sends to an agent has no guarantee that it will (or will not) > see the result of its action a tiny bit later, when the repl prints the > stringified version of the agent.
yeah, after posting this I went over to core_print.clj and took a look. I was also thinking about proposing that the REPL should await (or better await-for), but since the REPL can't know when the agent will finish, it wouldn't be good either. I can't think of a reliable solution for this. The same thing happens (of course) with the output of the current value, not just the error-state. I think the fact that having a thread-pool or not made a difference got me on the wrong track in the first place. Best regards, Stefan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
