On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Lee Spector <lspec...@hampshire.edu> wrote:
> > I'm still interested in any feedback on my "is there a best way -- > idiomatically and with respect to performance..." question, and I would > still like to better understand where those anomalies came from and how to > avoid them, particularly since a lot of my real code will unavoidably > generate garbage. And I haven't tried re-running my tests on my dual core > macbook yet, which I think will still be slower than sequential... > I don't think there's a silver bullet as illustrated by the performance difference between computations that generate a lot of ephemeral garbage and computations that are mostly CPU bound. But I have a feeling a good profiling tool like VisualVM can help you quickly and easily spot what's going on, http://visualvm.dev.java.net/. > Thanks so much, > > -Lee > Thank you! It's cool to see some benchmarking and experience info on Clojure running on a 48 core machine :D David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
