I was able to build ClojureCLR using the DLR 1.0 source and the latest clojure-clr in VS 2010. I am able to run Clojure.Main.exe and Clojure.Compile.exe. Is there a way to integrate these into VS, so that I can add .clj files to a project and set the build action to "Build" or "Build with Clojure.Compile.exe" and get a .dll out the other side?
On Aug 4, 8:45 pm, dmiller <dmiller2...@gmail.com> wrote: > the 7/23 date is, as they say, not operational. I've edited that out. > I'll go as far as 'soon'. (The new PC I was going supposed to move to > and install VS2010 on has to be replaced due to the possibility that > the hard disk will fry.) > > You cannot use DLR 1.0. I need things that are not in that release. > As stated on the wiki page: > > 'For the time being go "http://dlr.codeplex.com/SourceControl/ > changeset/changes/48032":here to get version 48032.' > > With a binary distribution, at least I can package an approved version > of the DLR. > > -David > > On Aug 4, 1:59 pm, eyeris <drewpvo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I tried to build the latest ClojureCLR using VS 2008. I used the DLR > > 1.0 release. I successfully replaced your DLR project references and > > built them: > > >http://imgur.com/SgUmu.jpg > > > Then I added a DLR reference to the Clojure project and built it, > > resulting in these two errors "The extern alias MSC was not specified > > in a /reference option": > > >http://imgur.com/LWjOs.jpg > > > Your installing-clojureclr page says "I know for sure that will work. > > I hope to bring everything up to VS2010 (and because of DLR, no more > > VS2008 for building) by 7/23/2010." but I didn't see anything in the > > commit history to suggest that you've done this. > > > On Aug 4, 12:25 am, eyeris <drewpvo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I would like a zip of DLLs that are as widely compatible as possible > > > across CLR/DLR versions accompanied by a clear list of which versions > > > are compatible. > > > > Regarding releases, I'm glad to lag behind the bleeding edge by a lot > > > in order to have a stable platform. What I want to be able to do is > > > grab the DLLs, add them as references to my VS project, and compile, > > > much like I do with NetBeans and the JVM clojure. > > > > I have to admit that I haven't tried ClojureCLR since right around the > > > 1.1 release, so I don't remember the details of the problems that I > > > encountered. I am in the process of migrating a lot of stuff from VS > > > 2008 to VS 2010. Once I finish that I will try ClojureCLR again and > > > get back to you regarding embedding and AOT. > > > > On Aug 3, 3:11 pm, dmiller <dmiller2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I can move creating a binary distribution to the to top of the list. > > > > > I could use some guidance from the interested on what would serve the > > > > purpose on this and other things mentioned here. > > > > > on the distribution: Do you want just a zip of of DLLs? An > > > > installer? Do you want installation to the GAC? > > > > > on 'stable, dependable': Is there any strategy on creating new > > > > releases that makes sense? Assume anyone wanting to stay on the > > > > bleeding edge will build for themselves? > > > > > start-up speed: I'mrunningsome experiments on that. The problem > > > > is mostly the monolithic nature of the assemblies created and the > > > > amount of environment initialization. Suggestions welcomed. > > > > > Ease of embeddability: please elaborate on the problems. > > > > > AOT'ing clj files: Ditto. > > > > > -David > > > > > On Aug 3, 12:47 pm, Timothy Baldridge <tbaldri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I really wish that ClojureCLR had a binary distribution. I like > > > > > > clojure a lot but I have a .Netbackground and a lot of .Netcode to > > > > > > interact with. If ClojureCLR had a stable, dependable binary > > > > > > distribution I would be able to use it at work much more than I > > > > > > already do. I don't care much about 1.2 features like defrecord. > > > > > > What > > > > > > I care about is start-up speed, ease of embeddability, and Visual > > > > > > Studio integration (not Intellisense, just AOT'ing .clj files). > > > > > > +1 for all of that > > > > > > That paragraph basically explains why I haven't started using clojure > > > > > at my work yet. > > > > > > Timothy Baldridge -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
