Hi, On Aug 10, 11:34 am, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The table shows that the performance of the accumulator-style version > of factorial is always worse than that of the original factorial > function." I'm a little bit surprised, that people still prefer programs, which are only sometimes not broken, over programs which work always correctly. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
