The standards doc on the wiki here: http://www.assembla.com/wiki/show/clojure/Clojure_Library_Coding_Standards
Makes this recommendation: "Idiomatic code uses destructuring a lot. However, you should only destructure in the arg list if you want to communicate the substructure as part of the caller contract. Otherwise, destructure in a first-line let. Example: my snake code from the book fails this test, doing too much destructuring in arg lists." I'm not entirely sure how to interpret this. If a function is expecting a certain argument structure, isn't it always better to document that in a destructuring argument list? I'm finding that destructured signatures generally help me track my dataflow better. Can somebody elucidate this distinction a bit? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
