Without commenting on the usefulness of this (it doesn't really interest me), there are a couple style things I would change. First, :added ought to be 1.3 (maybe 1.2?), not 1.0. Second, the newsgroup seems to think that if you're changing clojure.core you might as well update from (. staticMember class args) to (class/ staticMember args) while you're in there. You could also fix the other shift operators if you wanted.
On Aug 23, 1:15 pm, Cameron <cpuls...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey all, I had an itch this weekend... so I scratched it. > > I was doing some bit twiddling stuff and needed the Java >>> operator. > I had written some workarounds but they were overly-complicated and > slower than I would have hoped, so I dug directly into core and added > it as a first class citizen next to bit-shift-left and bit-shift- > right. Being a very creative person, I named it ">>>". The performance > is on par with the normal signed shift operators. > > To anyone who is interested, the patch can be found > at:http://github.com/cpulsford/bitops/blob/logical-assumption/unsigned-r... > > I'd love feedback, especially since this is my first time digging into > the Java side of Clojure. > > Could this maybe be something useful for core? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
