Yes, this is very important problem with current implementation of
Clojure.  Many of beginners complain, that they couldn't understand where
error happened, especially during compilation of code.

Phil Hagelberg  at "Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:55:52 -0700" wrote:
 PH> One of the most common complaints about the current implementation of
 PH> Clojure is that the stack traces are often unreadable. At work we have
 PH> been using Mark McGranaghan's clj-stacktrace library[1] to print stack
 PH> traces, and it does a great job of cleaning them up and making it much
 PH> clearer as to what the actual cause of the problem is. I've found it
 PH> invaluable for this--it provides indentation, better details, and even
 PH> coloring to help make the relevant frames stand out in the noise.

 PH> I've spoken to him about it, and he is agreeable to the idea of
 PH> merging it into Clojure. He is the sole author of it, and it sounds
 PH> like he'd be fine with relicensing and copyright assignment.

 PH> It appears at first glance to be compatible with the existing
 PH> clojure.stacktrace library. Obviously before it could be merged we
 PH> would need to investigate this more thoroughly, but I think it could
 PH> be a valuable improvement to Clojure 1.3.

 PH> Thoughts?

 PH> -Phil

 PH> [1] - http://github.com/mmcgrana/clj-stacktrace



-- 
With best wishes, Alex Ott, MBA
http://alexott.blogspot.com/           http://alexott.net
http://alexott-ru.blogspot.com/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to