Let's back up: what are you trying to do with 'extenders'? Stu
> Yes, thats what I see. > I just dont think this is very sensible. > > Thank you Meikel! > > Greetings, alux > > On 3 Sep., 13:10, Meikel Brandmeyer <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 3 Sep., 12:49, alux <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> shouldnt the type x be listed a extender of xx here? Or why not? >> >> No. It shows up if you actually use extend to the extend the protocol >> to the type. >> >> Sincerely >> Meikel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
