"Easy to grok" is music to my ears. I imagine most people who read my post would skip the proofs, and that is just fine. The proofs are gruntwork. I wouldn't want the tedious details to obscure the idea of the monad, which is quite elegant once you get your head around it.
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Eivind Magnus Hvidevold <hvidev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I liked it. Easy to grok. > I had some vague idea that monads are like "overloading the pipe operator in > a function pipeline", but now it's much clearer. > I know some abstract algebra, though not category theory. > I skipped the proofs, didn't care about those. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
