Yeah, it will the trade off is you lose line item visibility of failures. I guess eval isn't too bad in this case.
On Sep 21, 2:15 pm, Justin Kramer <jkkra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is using 'is' and 'every?' an option? > > (deftest test-good-labels > (is (every? valid-label? good-labels))) > > Justin > > On Sep 21, 11:53 am, Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I'm trying to pass a vector to are, because I need to reuse some > > source data. Is there a better way to do this? I don't like the > > eval. > > > (def good-labels > > [...]) > > > (deftest test-good-labels > > (eval `(are [label] (valid-label? label) ~...@good-labels))) > > > Sean -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
