Hi, On 30 Sep., 09:37, Sean Corfield <seancorfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's very similar to one of my attempts and... I don't know... I > just don't like it as much. Splitting the map into two streams and > zipping them back together just doesn't feel as 'nice' and making one > pass over the key/value pairs of the map... The two passes are an argument. I - personally - like the split, because it makes clear that the values are not touched, while they are carried as dead weight in the one solutions. > Interesting choice of comp - I think I went with #(s/upper-case (name > %)) - I guess comp is more idiomatic, functionally? Dunno. I don't use it very often. I normally also use #() but in this case it was nice and clean. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
