not really the problem is that the s-expression is passed I don't know it ahead of time during compilation .. it is known at run-time...
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Ulises <ulises.cerv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is it possible to write such a function? > > Perhaps you're looking for partial? > > user> (def x 10) > #'user/x > user> (let [y 5] (partial + x y)) > #<core$partial$fn__3680 clojure.core$partial$fn__3...@beebcd> > user> ((let [y 5] (partial + x y)) 1) > 16 > user> > > U > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
