Yes, those are the two choices. Ken's suggestion is the cleanest, and you definitely should do that in cases where it's not burdensome. Here, where it's a macro for private testing, and you are certain not to forget that it's magically binding session for you, then go ahead and use Laurent's suggestion to create bindings.
On Nov 8, 11:38 am, Miki <miki.teb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> that is, use ~'session instead of just session. > > What you really want in this case is a binding. Try this: > > ... > > The added parameter just before the body specifies a name to bind the > > session object to; this name can then be used in the body. > > This is good a well, but I prefer to dark magic suggested by Laurent :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
