I like this! It would be very helpful to have a type-hinted arglist(So I know it takes a seq and a number), and :similar to group things like map, pmap, amap, and :for for functions which are made for a specific thing, like swap! or deref.
On Nov 11, 1:04 am, Michael Gardner <gardne...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Alan wrote: > > > I guess you stay backwards-compatible by putting it in the docstring, > > but isn't it more general, clean, and programmatic to put these useful > > bits of information into new entries in (meta f)? > > That's pretty much what I was trying to get at with "structured fields", > though I was thinking more about the web documentation. I didn't know that > Clojure's core functions all have nice metadata. Neat! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
