Hi All,
I'm currently ploughing my way through Michael Fogus and Chris Housers
"The Joy of Clojure". I am currently reading up on destructuring. The
authors sum up the chapter by concluding that destructuring is the
idiomatic clojure replacement for accessor methods in OO languages.
Can someone explain what exactly they could mean? Has anyone an
example?
Furthermore, how can destructuring serve as a replacement for using
first and next?
Thanks everyone
Andreas

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to