Hi All, I'm currently ploughing my way through Michael Fogus and Chris Housers "The Joy of Clojure". I am currently reading up on destructuring. The authors sum up the chapter by concluding that destructuring is the idiomatic clojure replacement for accessor methods in OO languages. Can someone explain what exactly they could mean? Has anyone an example? Furthermore, how can destructuring serve as a replacement for using first and next? Thanks everyone Andreas
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en