Interesting. Is Byrd's dissertation available online?

On Dec 4, 9:41 pm, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I announced it earlier this week on Twitter, but it's now come far along
> enough to be usable. You can write fun stuff like the following:
>
> (defn likes
>   [x y]
>   (cond-e
>    ((== x 'john) (== y 'mary))
>    ((== x 'mary) (== y 'john))))
>
> (defn musician [x]
>   (cond-e
>    ((== x 'john))
>    ((== x 'bob))))
>
> (run* [q]
>   (likes q 'mary)
>   (musician q))
> ;; [john]
>
> (run* [q]
>   (musician q))
> ;; [john bob]
>
> (run* [q]
>   (exist [x y]
>     (likes x y)
>     (== [x y] q)))
> ;; [[john mary] [mary john]]
>
> My inspiration to start on this was Jim Duey's implementation. However I had
> two specific goals -
>
> * Focus on performance. While developing I compared performance against
> miniKanren under Racket - I made sure the Clojure implementation ran at
> least as fast, and in many cases it runs quite a bit faster
> * Implement "growable" sequences without resorting to Scheme's dotted pairs.
> This required me to develop a new protocol in which iteration might return a
> logic var instead of nil or a Seq.
>
> The implementation started with the one described William Byrd's
> dissertation. However a considerable number of changes were made-
>
> * substitutions are implemented as a protocol and a defrecord
> * substitutions internally use a PersistentHashMap as well as
> PersistentVector (for debugging)
> * supports unification of all the Clojure data structures supported by
> clojure.walk
> * goal and goal constructors are implements as deftypes (Mzero, Unit,
> Choice, Inc) and those implement IMPlus and IBind protocols.
>
> The code base is compact, some ~450 lines of Clojure.
>
> Future directions:
> * Friendlier interface for defining facts and running queries
> * There are many great ideas in William Byrd's thesis that need looking
> into. In particular I'm interested in tabling.
> * Investigating replacing the PersistentHashMap with a Skew Binary Random
> Access List or a Finger Tree. This would speed up the performance of the
> most expensive functions in the system, walk. In the Scheme implementations
> SBRALs can lead to 2.5X-100X in performance.
> * Modifying the core macros to optimize logic programs.
> * Parallel logic programming.
>
> Source and more info here,https://github.com/swannodette/logos.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to