The permissions were not set correctly for anonymous read access. I have 
changed them, you should be able to get there now: 
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CONTRIB-102.

Effective communication tip: Please preserve links in responses, so that when 
somebody is trying to track down issues they don't have to work back through 
the thread to find links.

Stu

> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Alan <a...@malloys.org> wrote:
>> Link works fine.
> 
> Does it?
> 
>> You have to be logged in
> 
> Then, in my opinion, it does NOT work fine. I should be able to VIEW
> anything non-confidential without logging in, though I expect to
> possibly have to login to POST stuff. (And if something IS
> confidential, but is also intended for me, then I should actually have
> whatever login is needed to view it. Say, the login for my gmail
> account.)
> 
> Furthermore, the link was posted as a response to one of my posts
> here. This implies that the link is meant for me, and that I should be
> able to read whatever's there (the actual meat of the response to my
> post, presumably) with my existing access credentials.
> 
> Posting a reply to someone that consists solely of a link that, when
> accessed by that someone, throws up an access denied message in their
> face, is an equivalent act to sending them an encrypted reply for
> which they don't have the key, or handing them a locked briefcase for
> which they don't know the combination. So, kind of silly, and
> ineffective at actually communicating with them since they can't read
> your reply.
> 
> Hence my assumption that a mistake of some sort had been made. It
> seems unlikely that someone would intentionally send me a reply I
> can't actually read, so I figured they did not intend that effect, but
> technical problems of some kind occurred or they simply misspelled the
> URL.
> 
> Now I'm simply confused. What, exactly, was intended? And if there's
> nothing actually private-to-me about the attempted communication and
> someone here is prviy to its contents, perhaps they could simply
> repost those contents here?
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to