2011/1/24 Shantanu Kumar <kumar.shant...@gmail.com>: > I noticed that in 'with-open' macro the .close() method is called > without wrapping in another try-catch block. Exceptions raised in the > finally block prevails over the exception raised in the try block. Is > this intended behavior or I am missing something? > > Is there an alternative where the exceptions raised due to > invoking .close() can be ignored?
That's interesting. Indeed, it seems to me that the .close() call should be wrapped by a try / catch with an empty catch. Regards, -- Laurent > > Regards, > Shantanu > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
