Ugly?  Aww, I thought the ^ metadata looked kinda cute...

It is a bit awkward that defn- exists and not def-, but it seems defs
are not going to be as common as defns (though I'll admit I haven't
written or read enough complex idiomatic Clojure code to know for
sure).  And if you really want to be consistent you would probably
also want defmulti-, defmacro-, defstruct-, defprotocol-, etc.  And
I'll have to stop using tiny fonts to read Clojure code so I can tell
if something is private or not.

If we really wanted to make it easy to write private functions,
variables, etc, I would personally prefer a macro like (private) for
which all forms inside would be made private.  Like
(private
  (def my-private-foo (...))
  (defn my-private-bar [] (...)))

Not only does that seem more clear, it would encourage the private
stuff to be separate from public stuff.

On Jan 22, 10:27 am, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Please don't. It has already been discussed and declined. The metadata is 
> uglier because we want doing this to be slightly ugly..
>
> Stu
>
> Stuart Halloway
> Clojure/corehttp://clojure.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I think a def- definitely belongs in core for consistency reasons.
> > So I'm writing a ticket and patch now.
>
> > Cheers, Benjamin
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Clojure" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> > your first post.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to