if you really want to keep things simple you should just say '(Person. "..." 18) without all the concat noise the solution becomes obvious. you have a form (new Person X Y), you want to execute the code with different values bound to X and Y at runtime, sounds like a function to me.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Quzanti <quza...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > On Feb 4, 2:23 am, Kevin Downey <redc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> whole crazy concat thing >> which has nothing to do with anything > > I probably should have clarified that the reason I need concat is that > various functions are returning subsets of the arguments as vectors, > but as stated to keep things simple in the example I just used values > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- And what is good, Phaedrus, And what is not good— Need we ask anyone to tell us these things? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
