On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz <apg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Can't you just use extend-protocol to group your protocol
>>> implementations for each record type in one place?
>>
>> That certainly works, but it's really not much different than:
>>
>> (defrecord Bar [x y]
>>   Foo
>>     (bar [_] ...)
>>     (baz [_] ...)
>>
>> which is what I'm trying to avoid.
>>
>> It seems to me that the only reason that specifying the entire
>> implementation together is to avoid situations where the
>> implementation is not completely defined.
>>
>> See, I'm less concerned about implementing the Protocol than I am
>> about creating "functions" that are dispatched by type, and since they
>> have to have the same argument list, I see no reason why that
>> boilerplate can't be eliminated.
>>
>> Perhaps one solution for me is to write a macro that constructs a
>> protocol (and extends it to types) out of the definitions provided..
>> sort of a hybrid of extend-protocol and defp from before.
>>
>> (defwhatever Foo
>>   (bar [_]
>>     String (body)
>>     Character (body))
>>   (baz [_]
>>     String (body)
>>     Character (body)))
>>
>> Which gets me to where I ultimately want to be (methods defined
>> together per type extended too), but not quite what I'm really looking
>> for.
>
> Now it sounds like you might want a plain old multimethod.

It'd be more easily done with multimethods, sure, but since they all
implement both methods, there's no reason to not use protocols. See
the dilemma?


> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en



-- 
http://www.apgwoz.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to