I'm going to leave the poll up for one more week for those interested in casting a vote.
https://spreadsheets.google.com/a/thinkrelevance.com/viewform?hl=en&formkey=dE92bEdzMmpVOURDNUVHOWpaVXVhU3c6MQ#gid=0 Just to be clear, this is about capturing a strong objection to calling the next version 1.3. If you are in the camp of not caring what the next version number is, then you do not have a strong objection. I.e. you are not "morally opposed." On Feb 22, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Christopher Redinger wrote: > As you can see on the Release.Next Planning page [1], there is an open > question about whether or not the next version of Clojure should be 1.3 or > 2.0. The issue at hand is that we are introducing backwards incompatible API > changes. Not looking to start a debate at this point, but just taking a > temperature reading from the community. If you care about what the next > version number of Clojure is - could you please cast a vote in the poll here: > > https://spreadsheets.google.com/a/thinkrelevance.com/viewform?hl=en&formkey=dE92bEdzMmpVOURDNUVHOWpaVXVhU3c6MQ#gid=0 > > Thanks! > > [1] http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Release.Next+Planning > > -- > Christopher Redinger > http://clojure.com > -- Christopher Redinger http://clojure.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
