You're right. Your version does what I want. Actually I've just seen
that common lisps behaviour in the case of duplicates is undefined:
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/Groups/AI/html/cltl/clm/node152.html
I was certain that it behaved the way your intersect behaves.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to