Something along those lines. The key would be to have low publication latency 
e.g. articles undergo a initial review in a matter of hours so it
still has the blog vibe to it but undergo stricter quality control.

On 14/03/2011, at 8:57 PM, Nick Zbinden wrote:

> This sounds very good. It would have to be start up with one topic
> (lisp or FP) and if the system worked you could add more topics.
> 
> The length could be like steve yeggy blogposts or like the ibm ähh
> articals (http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-clojure-
> protocols/).
> 
> On Mar 14, 11:12 am, Andreas Kostler
> <andreas.koestler.le...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 14/03/2011, at 8:00 PM, Saul Hazledine wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 14, 3:41 am, Andreas Kostler <andreas.koestler.le...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>>> Maybe this group could finally get the ball rolling...Surely a collection 
>>>> of highly talented individuals could initiate a forum for
>>>> technical exchange at the level Peter suggests (somewhere between a blog 
>>>> and a book) - basically the level DDJ is operating
>>>> at these days.
>> 
>>> The level you mention suggests some sort of review (possibly
>>> anonymous?).
>> 
>>> One possibility is to base it around a web application to make things
>>> relatively low maintenance. Just an idea for discussion - somebody
>>> could submit a text in the style of a blog post which is then passed
>>> to relevant reviewers who come back with comments. If the post isn't
>>> accepted the author doesn't loose much as they can then post it as a
>>> normal blog.
>> 
>> That's exactly what I mean. I was thinking of some sort of exponential
>> review process...at first it gets submitted to 4 people, if 3 give their 
>> thumbs
>> up it gets published and submitted to 16 people and so on. The more people
>> give their thumbs up, the higher it will appear on the main page. Something 
>> along those lines.
>> One could also introduce elements like stackoverflow does (medals etc) to 
>> encourage
>> people a) to publish and b) to review.
>> Ranking the post in terms of positive reviews boosts 'good' posts :)
>> This is just a first thought and certainly could use some refinement.
>> 
>> Having said that, I'd like to see the quality and extent of the posts to be
>> somewhere between research papers and blogposts.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> The reviewing is work but if its kept in the style of a blog post
>>> rather than an academic paper the overhead shouldn't be too high. The
>>> use of an application would reduce the need for an editor.
>> 
>>> Saul
>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

--
"Test-driven Dentistry (TDD!) - Not everything should be test driven"
- Michael Fogus
-- 
**********************************************************
Andreas Koestler, Software Engineer
Leica Geosystems Pty Ltd
270 Gladstone Road, Dutton Park QLD 4102
Main: +61 7 3891 9772     Direct: +61 7 3117 8808
Fax: +61 7 3891 9336
Email: andreas.koest...@leica-geosystems.com

************www.leica-geosystems.com*************

when it has to be right, Leica Geosystems

Please  consider the environment before printing this email.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to