Hi, On 3 Apr., 13:18, Ken Wesson <kwess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> "Less" involved? Your solution combines 5 sequences with drop-while-first-map-second magic which I personally don't find very self-explaining at first sight. My solution does one step with only local impact and then delegates to a single well-known library function. For laziness there is some cost involved, I agree. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
