>> If I understand your claim correctly, it's therefore wrong. > > Since it's correct, you don't understand my claim correctly.
That is rather rude and arrogant. > Using your partition-by. [snip] This seems to contradict the test results I posted earlier. Perhaps it is behaving differently on your system -- what is your Clojure version? Maybe some issue with locals clearing? In any event, where in my code are you claiming a reference is being held? If you continue to stand by your claim, point to the exact spot. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
