Yeah, I've got a permanent clojuredocs tab open all the time, but still it would be nice to settle this discussion, as currently their are doc strings that require a google search or a look at the source to see what they mean though, which is not ideal. Many of us are happy to help if we can have a place to direct our energy. Using :examples metadata (or even having the examples somewhere on contrib) would be fine, as long as they can show up on the repl and in tools when you run (doc <fn>).
-Jeff On Apr 8, 2:18 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: > Hi, > > it was discussed before whether examples should go into the docstring. > Or to an :examples metadata to be even executable at the repl. Some > expressed the opinion that docstring should be short and that such > "additional" documentation should go somewhere else. I don't remember > what the outcome of the discussion was. > > Until this discussion is settled this site might help to scratch your > itch:http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/defmethod. And > you can help out there easily without CA and such. > > Sincerely > Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
