Thanks for the link to the new documentation. > That's how one hints a non-primitive return type; that's been the case for a > long time now.
I know, but haven't needed it; I guess it's for Java interop. > hinting arg vectors in order to indicate function return types is a > syntactically poor choice > In any case, the syntactic position of function return type hints should be > consistent regardless of the "category" of return type I can see the inconsistency but for multiple arity/body functions that's not a bad place to put it. My suggestion would be to extend (declare) à la maclisp and keep the actual fn clean of hints (at least the signature). http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/mit/ai/aim/AIM-421.pdf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
