On Jun 29, 12:55 am, Ken Wesson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Alan Malloy <[email protected]> wrote: > > This layout makes it fairly clear that the first element of total- > > values is never being used, but it would be nice if we could say so > > explicitly. So finally, we can wrap the whole thing in a let: > > > (defn calc [total-values daily-values] > > (let [interesting-values (next total-values)] > > (map-indexed > > (fn [i daily] > > (->> total-values > > (drop i) > > (map #(inc (/ % 100.0))) > > (reduce * daily))) > > daily-values))) > > Oops.
Not sure if this is what you're pointing out (a single word is tricky to decipher), but I did forget to *use* interesting-values after defining it: it should be the first form in the ->> list. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
