2011/7/13 Sebastián Galkin <paras...@gmail.com> > Oh I see it now, the call is inverted in 1.2.1 core.clj. Thanks, it was > driving me crazy. > > Regarding Meikel comment on clojure-dev > > > I will open a ticket to either apply the shown fix, or modify the > contract of reduce to require pureness of f. > > I think that changing reduce contract, such a basic building block, may be > a little harsh. >
Making assumptions between the order of realization of seq elements and calls to the reducing functions seems crazy to me, really. I don't even see why a ticket should be opened, or the contract of reduce should be changed. My 0.02€, -- Laurent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
