On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Chas Emerick <cemer...@snowtide.com> wrote: > There's no way that `ns` and its constituent pieces are the last word in > defining/managing codebase topologies, but they are a bit of a local maxima. > ns+ looks nice (I'm surprised I haven't come across it so far), but I'm > surprised that there haven't been more attempts to cut a "better ns" out > there. As shown in the "hello world" example for ns+, it's trivial to > augment or entirely replace ns
Bootstrapping is still a problem as clojure.core/ns is special-cased to always be available in every namespace ever. In our application at work we had to resort to defing ns+ in clojure.core inside user.clj in order for it to be available across the board--pretty cringe-worthy and doesn't compose. Would be happy to come up with a satisfactory solution to this. But nstools addresses one of my one remaining major pain points surrounding Clojure, and I'm looking forward to making better use of it. -Phil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
