Hi,
Am Montag, 22. August 2011 16:08:20 UTC+2 schrieb lpetit: > > 2011/8/22 Dave Ray <dav...@gmail.com> > >> I'm not sure why this code was written this way, but Marginalia has no >> problem using docstrings. Compare it's own docs: >> [...] > > ok, thanks Dave > that Marginalia also understands docstrings notwithstanding I still look at this type of comments with some skepticism since it encourages the documentation outside its "natural" position. Just think of all the people that are used to JavaDoc: where would they write their documentation? Actually, I'd rather vote for even more strictness here, because it has been bothering me for close to 15 years now that docstrings break the homoiconicity of Lisp. Just my 2ct, though. (And I love Marginalia, since It let's me create wonderful material for Clojure talks; of course using out-of-place comments ;-) Cheers, Stefan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
