The runtime performance should be the same, but the startup time will be slower because it will have to compile the clojure code at load time.
-- Dave On 25 Aug 2011 12:15, "Terje Dahl" <te...@terjedahl.no> wrote: > Yes. My applet is signed. So that is not a problem. > > Any thoughts about difference in performance between "slim" and > "full"? > My applet mostly does swing-stuff, http GETS and POSTS - and audio > playback and recording. > > > > > On 25 Aug, 10:40, David Powell <d...@djpowell.net> wrote: >> The slim jar probably won't work in an applet, because it does classloader >> stuff (unless you have a signed applet). >> >> -- >> Dave > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
