Just a little remark: Keep in mind, that clutch https://github.com/ashafa/clutch comes with a CouchDB view server that can execute Clojure code. So compiling to JS only seems desirable to me, when you can't configure an additional view server on your CouchDB. Performance wise, it should make no big difference, since JS views are also executed on a separate view server.
regards 2011/9/13 Pepijn de Vos <pepijnde...@gmail.com>: > While reading about ClojureScript, I saw a couple of mentions of CouchDB as > a use case for ClojureScript. > Would anyone care to elaborate? Is this anything more than an abstract idea? > There is no CouchDB compile target AFAIK, and I can't see how any of the > others would work out of the box. > The simplest approach would be to compile to a couch app, and let couchapp > compile and upload the design doc. > To do this, no optimizations should be applied, as we need multiple files. > But then either CommonJS requires or Couchapp macros will need to be > generated. Or can this be made to work with Closure style requires as well? > The other option is to directly compile ClojureScript to a design doc. I > have no idea how hard this is. > Pepijn -- __________________________________________________________________ Herwig Hochleitner -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
