Fogus confirmed it is intended and will reply when he gets a chance. I'm starting to see why - the values are read as literals and so forms are read as literals and not evaluated. I expect many people will find this behavior surprising on first encounter...
On Oct 26, 8:55 am, Chouser <chou...@gmail.com> wrote: > I suspect it is intended. You certainly wouldn't want those interior > forms evaluated at reader time. To be more like literal vectors and > maps, eval would have to know how to handle each record type, find the > forms contained in the values, evaluate them, and build a new record > with the results. Off the top of my head I don't see why this would > be impossible, but it may not be desirable. > > --Chouser -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
