> '(1 2 3) is a list that is not evaluated. No loss of generality. it's a > special type of list. One that's not evaluated. as opposed to a special > indicator to the repl.
That would essentially be a new data structure, filling a role mostly already filled by vectors. And you would still need the core structure used for code and data (the list), and you would still need a way to tell the reader when you don't want to evaluate that structure. Then we're back to the current situation but with different characters. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
