I don't quite understand why people are saying this. Anyway, It's not enough for me.
On Dec 14, 9:13 pm, Kevin Downey <redc...@gmail.com> wrote: > lazy-seq and letfn should cover anything you would need letrec for > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Razvan Rotaru <razvan.rot...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > Is there a reliable implementation of letrec in clojure? Anybody using > > it? > > I have found a post from 2008, with an implementation which I don't > > understand (and it's said to be slow), and which I don't know whether > > to trust.(It's also supposed to be slow). > > > Thanks, > > Razvan > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > > your first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > -- > And what is good, Phaedrus, > And what is not good— > Need we ask anyone to tell us these things? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
