Thank your for patience with me. :) Now it's clearer. Case 2 and 3 is what I would expect from Clojure and Case 3 is the correct way to solve that problem. Case 1 is surprising (at least for me) and I would consider it “just lucky” as you put it. Adding the explicit require will always work and is robust against changing odds (“bad luck”).
My 0.02€. Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
