Cedric Greevey <cgree...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Tassilo Horn <tass...@member.fsf.org> wrote: >> At least, it seems that (fn ^double [^double x] (+ x 0.5)) compiles to a >> class supporting primitive, unboxed calls. > > Yes. That was my conclusion also. But apparently the only way to get > the compiler to emit such a call is by binding the fn to a global Var > with the appropriate hints and calling that.
Yeah, I know. And now I can also see it in the Compiler's InvokeExpr class. In its constructor, there's some extra work in case of a VarExpr where the signature :tag metadata is pulled out from the :arglists metadata. Why is the :arglists metadata added to the Var a function's bound to instead of the function itself? Bye, Tassilo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
