Hi Stefan,
On Feb 27, 3:23 pm, Stefan Kamphausen <ska2...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> extracting forms from the REPL session into some test-magic definitely is
> useful. However, my sessions seem to be structured in a different way and
> only having access to the previous three inputs doesn't seem viable to me.
> I think, I'd prefer a REPL where I would tell swank to start recording my
> stuff and later extract all the interactions which didn't yield an
> exception. Mind, that this is just guessing what would feel right, though.
thanks for your thoughts. It is really the simplest solution that I
could think of and does not necessarily fit everyones workflow. I tend
to use very short snippets at the repl which are usually self
contained, i.e. do not depend on defined variables, but rely heavily
on *1, *2 as shortcuts to save typing. Up to now, I did not bother
much to make unit tests out of my repl experiments. This mode
hopefully improves on that ;-)
Best,
Nils
>
> Kind regards,
> Stefan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
